DGT: “Gun control? We need some bullet control!” – Chris Rock

For future reference, DGT merely stands for “Downright Good Thought” (I’ve gotten tired of always typing that out and plus, my pinky is still broken so any time I can type less, I’m going to take it).

This post will hopefully be quick to the point but bear with me if I get a little wordy. I wanted to start off with a quote from comedian Chris Rock who did a standup act quite a few years ago in which he talked about the state of gun usage in America. He addressed about how people could just walk around shooting up folks due to the right to bear arms and so forth. In order to parody the situation, he claimed that what we really needed was “bullet control”. One bullet would be worth a million dollars, or more even. That way, if someone was really out to get you, he’d know for certain that he wanted you dead due to impact it would have on his pocketbook. It’s relatively morbid humor, but I remember laughing along with Mr. Rock during this particular show of his. It was funny since who could imagine paying such a large sum of money just to have bullets in a gun? Honestly, who could?

However, in light of the recent tragedy befalling Chiefs linebacker Jevon Belcher and his now-passed girlfriend, it seems like the cost of the bullet really wouldn’t matter. If you are unfamiliar with this sad story, the former linebacker had apparently murdered his girlfriend last week and then promptly took his own life later that day. He did so right outside the stadium at which Kansas City plays their home football games as well. Yet another unfortunate and sad tale synonymous with professional athletes and the inherent pressures linked therein. I am sorry to those close to this family during a time of grievance. It’s something that no family ever dreams of or wants to endure.

Getting back to Mr. Rock’s argument, bullet control seems like the right answer here. Make the cost of something so ridiculously high that nobody could buy a dangerous weapon in the first place. For an individual who plays professional sports though, money can be an expendable thing. The cost of the bullet is of no consequence; only accessibility in retrieving said bullets. Any celebrity, pro athlete, or person of authority with enough capital could buy these so-called million dollar bullets at his leisure. There’s no denying that.

So what to do now? Following this situation, the Chiefs decided to go on and play their regularly scheduled game on Sunday, the 2nd of December. During the national broadcast, acclaimed reporter Bob Costas took a few moments to do something that most TV journalists never do – he spoke out on the issue from a personal level. He called for increased gun control across the States and if there were greater restrictions (dare I say, like bullet control) then these two individuals might still be alive today.

In hindsight, he may have a point, but that’s only hindsight speaking. What’s done is done.

I’m sure that Mr. Costas had the best intentions in mind when he made that statement to the public this past week. I’m almost 100% certain of that. Somewhere in his heart he felt compelled to voice genuine concern and since he had the resources available to him, he made a plea to do something about a growing epidemic in not just sports, but in all facets of American livelihood. I applaud Mr. Costas for speaking out but what I was really waiting to hear from him did not get mentioned at all.

You see, merely taking away the gun does not solve the problem at hand. True, if it were illegal to have these guns, then maybe this event wouldn’t have transpired. But it wouldn’t have happened via the use of a gun. It could have been a knife, or a sling, or who knows what. The point is, there was a deeper issue at hand which drove this individual to make such a rash decision. Regardless of having the gun at all, it was likely Mr. Belcher’s wish to inflict harm to not only himself but to another close to him.

The burning question left for everyone else then is this: WHY. Why did this happen? Who is responsible? And what can we do to alleviate this from happening in the future? Is it bullet control? No, we know that people will find ways around that since money is a material item which can be bartered for, worked for, or accumulated. Should we just take all guns away and outlaw them? No, we know that people will still commit heinous crimes without the use of a gun.

So where does this leave us? I’ve meditated on the subject and can only find one real solution: transformation of the individual. What does that mean? It means a change in the way we live our lives; all the way from the ground up. Our morals, our values, our beliefs; the whole nine yards and then some. It means proactively seeking those who are tortured and broken. Give this person the support he needs because we know, deep down, that this person matters. For if someone can feel love, then he’ll be awakened to alternatives that don’t spell the end of his own life (or the life of another). Am I asking people to sit in circles, hold hands, and sing “Kum ba ya” with one another? No, absolutely not. There is far more work to be done than simply telling a troubled person, “Hey, I care and guess what, you matter.” It’s much, much more than that, but we need to recognize this step first if we are ever going to turn potential tales of tragedy into retellings of rebirth and redemption.

My hope is that you would read this and understand what I’m talking about.


  1. Well stated and very thought provoking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: